Defense contractors fight back against NDAA repair language 완벽가이드
Defense contractors fight back against NDAA repair language
정치 전문 정보
U.S. defense contractors have launched a lobbying and public relations blitz to defeat a provision in the Senate-passed NDAA that would set strict new rules for how the Pentagon accesses their intellectual property. The issue is among the last unresolved matters facing House and Senate negotia
핵심 특징
고품질
검증된 정보만 제공
빠른 업데이트
실시간 최신 정보
상세 분석
전문가 수준 리뷰
상세 정보
핵심 내용
U.S. defense contractors have launched a lobbying and public relations blitz to defeat a provision in the Senate-passed NDAA that would set strict new rules for how the Pentagon accesses their intellectual property. The issue is among the last unresolved matters facing House and Senate negotiators who aim to reconcile before December the House and Senate fiscal 2026 NDAAs. The Senate’s so-called right-to-repair provision states that the Pentagon may not, with certain exceptions, enter into a contract unless the deal requires the company to provide the government with the data needed to operate and sustain the equipment. That data means a lot to the contractors because it is worth many billions of dollars over time. To a servicemember it also means a lot: Being able to fix a weapon can mean the difference between life and death. And the cost of such repairs is a major driver of defense budget growth, experts have long said. ‘Squeezing’ the military The NDAA argument’s ferocity in recent days reflects those stakes
상세 분석
. On Friday, Aerospace Industries Association President and CEO Eric Fanning penned an op-ed in the Washington Times arguing that the Senate provision would “cripple innovation” in the defense business. Supporters of the Senate’s right to repair provision say it’s a way to ensure the armed services can maintain their weapons at reasonable cost. The White House and top Defense Department leaders have endorsed the principle of ensuring the U.S.
정리
military has what it needs to repair its weapons, though some of them acknowledge that devilish details have yet to be set. In an April memo, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Army to include right-to-repair provisions in new contracts and modifications to existing deals “where intellectual property constraints limit the Army’s ability to conduct maintenance and access the appropriate maintenance tools, software, and technical data, while preserving the intellectual capital of American industry.” The Senate language was written by two Armed Services Committee members, Democrat Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Republican Tim Sheehy of Montana. Warren, in an email response to a query on Friday, said the support of Hegseth and other military leaders suggests her provision is the right answer for the armed forces. “Military leaders, service members, the White House, and hundreds of small businesses all agree these bipartisan right to repair reforms are desperately needed,” Warren said via email on Friday. “The giant defense contractors fighting these reforms are more interested in innovating new ways to squeeze our military and taxpayers than strengthening our national security.” Earlier this week, Warren made public a Nov. 5 letter she had sent to another contractor group, the Na
자주 묻는 질문
Q. 어떤 정보를 제공하나요?
A. 정치 관련 최신 정보를 제공합니다.
Q. 신뢰할 수 있나요?
A. 검증된 출처만 선별합니다.
Q. 더 궁금한 점은?
A. 댓글로 문의하세요.
원문 출처
이 글은 원본 기사를 참고하여 작성되었습니다.
댓글